(English version
follows after the Chinese, titled: Thoughts on the Invitation List
of EPD China Board Members)
EPD中国计划年底召开首届理事大会,秘书处要我提交理事会成员名单,逐一进行邀请——于是我开始打开我的通讯录,准备着手联络企业、行业以及社会机构的领袖,共同推动可持续产品和经济发展。
可是,慢着,EPD中国需要什么样的理事会成员呢?除了满足民非机构理事会设置要求之外,理事会的设立到底对于机构的使命和建设具备什么样的意义?理事会除了每年开几次会议,履行EPD中国战略指导和支持发展的角色,是否还有别的呢?
(图1: 一米一远程“出席”的全球LCA合作伙伴大会,2022年9月于巴塞罗那)
断断续续想了几天,没有下文,我想可能是碰到认知的瓶颈了,于是开始看社会学方面的书,毕竟理事会属于社会管理科学的范畴,一番折腾,我找到了一个线索——近代哲学家马克思韦伯,他提出了现代人——也就是各位——的“理性”这个概念,他说进入现代社会,人类需要平衡工具理性和价值理性这两个部分,顾名思义,我们需要用价值理性来确定共同的发展目标,然后用工具理性来实现这个目标。但是这两个理性都带来了现代社会的矛盾:价值多元造成的现代人的众说纷纭和结论的不唯一性和不确定性(即无所谓绝对的对错),以及工具效率至上造成的人的物化和工具化,人变成了效率机器上的零件和流水线上KPI考核的数字,而不再是一个个鲜活的个体——他说过一句话:“专家没有灵魂”,意思是说,身处社会效率至上这个铁笼之中,即使有丰富的知识,成了“专家”,也只不过是一种高级零件罢了。我们人类作为“万物的灵长”,自己和周遭各类生命和灵性发展的需求被忽视和淹没了。
(图2: 哲学家马克斯韦伯)
韦伯关于现代社会的理性问题的思考,让我在考虑理事会成员名单的时候,逐渐形成了一个准则——既要考虑价值理性的判断,也要遵循工具理性的科学,二者必须兼顾,不可偏颇。
换句话说,理事会的成员应该是价值理性和工具理性的合集,这个合集能从最大程度上确保EPD中国战略决策过程中多元价值的不缺席(而成为弱势群体被忽视),又能保证多元环境、社会及经济价值得以按照高效有序的方式落地和执行。而现代社会,同时具备多元价值理性和全部工具理性的生物是稀有的,为了不掉进多元价值观的争论不休、无所适从,以及唯效率至上论的‘人格工具化’的陷阱,我们就需要建立一个“和而不同”的君子道场——如此看来,孔子所说的“道不同,不相为谋”是有问题的,至少在现代社会我们也要对这个‘道’字做出新的解释:每一个人都有不同的价值诉求和专业领域,需要接受和不同价值诉求和专业认知的人一起讨论和共同解决问题,是为守道。那种因为怕麻烦而拒绝多元价值观的做法放在几千年前没人质疑,现在还坚持一元论就有点价值观洁癖的倾向了——至少把多元价值或“别人的”工具简单地放在对立面,或者坚持单一价值或工具至上的做法,都不可取。
扯远了,回来说我们的理事会,有了这样的准则,我心里EPD中国的理事会成员选择标准便逐步清晰起来:
在价值理性方面,既要结合EPD中国的价值标准,即促进绿色产品和服务的建设,实现生态经济文明,又要兼顾社会和经济价值的可持续发展方向;在工具理性方面,在建设和应用标准、体系、知识以及工具方面,不遗余力地实现上述综合价值理性的最大化。
所以,啰嗦了半天,我们到底要邀请谁?这个问题,暂时保密,还是等11月EPD中国首届理事及成员大会,我们见分晓吧——如果您觉得身边有符合上述标准的大咖,愿意代表不同价值体系和专业领域参加EPD中国的发展建设,也欢迎推荐(邮箱:secretary@epdchina.cn),谢谢您的支持。
2022年9月6日星期二
Thoughts on the Invitation List of EPD China
Board Members
EPD China plans to hold its first board
meeting at the end of the year. The secretariat asked me to submit a candidate list
of board members and invite. So, I opened my address book and prepared to start
contacting leaders of enterprises, industries, and social organizations to
jointly promote sustainable products. and economic development.
But wait, what kind of board members does EPD
China need? In addition to meeting the requirements for setting up the board of
non-profit institutions, what significance does the establishment of the board
have for the mission and development of the institution? In addition to meeting
several times a year, is there anything else the board can do to guide and
support the development of EPD China's strategy?
After thinking about it off and on for a few
days, I didn’t get a clear answer. Recognizing is as a bottleneck of cognition,
I started to read some books on sociology. Luckily, after a lot of tossing, I
found a name——Marx Weber, a modern philosopher, who put
forward the concept of "rationality" of modern people, that is, you
and me. He said that in entering modern society, human beings need to balance
the two parts of instrumental rationality and value rationality. As the name
suggests, we need to use Value rationality to determine common development
goals, and then use instrumental rationality to achieve this goal. But these
two rationales both bring about contradictions in modern society: the divergent
opinions of modern people and the non-uniqueness and uncertainty of conclusions
(that is, there is no absolute right or wrong) caused by the pluralism of
values, and the materialization of people caused by the supremacy of
instrumental efficiency and instrumentalization, people have become parts of
efficient machines and the numbers of KPI assessments on the assembly line,
rather than living individuals - he once said: "Experts have no
soul", which means that one's body in the iron cage where social
efficiency is paramount , even if you have a wealth of knowledge and become an
"expert", you are only a highly sophisticated component. As the
"primate of all things", human being and other life’s needs are ignored
and overwhelmed.
Weber's thinking about rationality in modern
society gradually formed a guideline when I was considering the list of board
members - both the judgment of value rationality and the science of
instrumental rationality must be considered.
In other words, the members of the board
should be a combination of value rationality and instrumental rationality. This
combination can to the greatest extent ensure that multiple values are not
absent in the process of EPD China's strategic decision-making (and become
vulnerable groups and are ignored), and can ensure that the diversified environmental,
social and economic values are implemented and executed in an efficient and
orderly manner. In modern society, it is rare to find people with both multiple
value rationality and all instrumental rationality. In order not to fall into
the trap of endless debate over multiple values, and the 'instrumentalization
of personality' of efficiency-only theory, we need to establish a A gentleman's
dojo of "harmony but different" - from this point of view, what
Confucius said, "People with different direction (Dao) don’t walk together"
is problematic. At least in modern society, we have to make a new
interpretation of the word 'Dao' : People has different value and professional
fields. It is necessary to discuss and solve problems together with people with
different background. The practice of rejecting multiple values for fear of
trouble was unquestioned thousands of years ago, and now insisting on monism is
a bit of a cleanliness of values - at least putting multiple values or other knowledge
or tools on the opposite side, is not desirable.
Maybe I have gone too far, let’s come back to the topic of selecting board of directors. With such a
guideline, the selection criteria for EPD China’s board
members have gradually become clear in my mind:
In terms of value rationality, it is necessary to combine EPD China’s value and mission, that is, to promote green products and economy. In
terms of instrumental rationality, board members would facilitate the development
and application of standards, systems, knowledge and tools, to achieve the
above-mentioned sustainability value of EPD China and beyond.
So, who are
we going to invite? I can’t say for the time being. Let’s wait until the first EPD
China Board Member Meeting in November 2022. Your recommendations of splendid candidates
are also welcome (email: secretary@epdchina.cn ) , thank you for your support.
Bill Kung
EPD China
Secretariat & Founding team
Tuesday,
September 6, 2022
Bill是1mi1绿色智造平台高级顾问
一米一平台开源合作——千帆计划2024-11-11 22:43:48
SimaPro操作入门(四)2024-07-23 13:59:54
SimaPro入门(一)2024-07-23 13:50:02
SimaPro操作入门(二)2024-07-23 13:49:27
SimaPro操作入门(三)2024-07-23 13:48:53
How does 1mi1-platform support ESG 2024-05-07 10:02:37
写给一米一绿色娘子军——祝女同胞们节日快乐2024-03-08 16:05:17
SimaPro 操作分步讲解2023-06-06 14:50:58
中国电力LCI数据更新20202023-02-18 13:13:43
怎么正确理解碳足迹的不确定性2022-11-26 15:59:41
碳中和——EPD中国的贡献2022-02-07 12:40:56
循环经济的环境影响评估:丹麦建筑产品案例2022-02-04 14:11:00
中国电力数据更新-2021.42021-05-24 16:54:06
The GOOD roadmap of Carbon Neutral2021-01-05 11:30:27
生态设计引领企业碳中和发展2020-11-20 10:34:51
Carbon Neutral - 1mi1 round table2020-10-29 09:24:15
产品绿色设计——你所知道的可能都是错的2020-06-09 16:24:35
产品碳足迹评价2020-03-10 22:15:53
update of Chinese electricity data2020-03-05 20:16:51
1001绿品共创 - 绿色产品评价LCA评价2020-01-17 14:28:29
1001绿品共创模块1-1:LCA评价基础理论(1)2019-12-09 20:11:13
无条件免费这件事—附绿色产品秘诀2019-10-21 19:22:35
绿色价值评估——守护投资的价值2019-10-11 11:14:28
产品社会影响评价(PSIA):一米一绿品共创系列课程2019-09-05 08:27:32
LCA 一米一 SimaPro进阶讲解:与外部数据进行链接2019-09-03 08:20:54
Design thinking on green supply 2019-06-22 18:56:34
1001绿品共创模块3-1: 环保产品声明EPD介绍(下)2019-05-27 18:14:40
1001绿品共创模块3-1: 环保产品声明EPD介绍(上)2019-05-27 18:11:08
一米一绿色智造平台用户手册V3.02019-05-22 21:00:18
1001绿品共创模块2-2:基于生命周期的绿色供应链管理2019-05-03 10:25:12
1001绿品共创模块1-3: LCA评价之评价方法与阐述2019-05-03 10:24:16
1001绿品共创模块 1-2: LCA评价之清单与数据收集2019-05-03 10:07:20
1001绿品共创模块2-1:生态设计 0415第五堂课2019-05-03 10:01:22
一米一SimaPro进阶讲解:分组操作2019-04-28 10:14:42
一米一SimaPro进阶讲解:参数化导入应用2019-04-28 10:09:51
一米一 SimaPro进阶讲解:项目的转移编辑操作2019-04-28 10:06:24
SimaPro——有关评估结果图表的应用2019-04-28 10:05:43
1001绿品共创模块1-4: 绿色产品评价之LCA 0325第四堂课2019-04-25 17:42:27
巧克力的生命周期分析2018-11-28 01:08:35
食品行业可持续发展案例研究——雀巢2018-11-26 21:59:58